Interpretation of the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Sector: Key Risk Considerations

By: Hao Zhan, Ying Song & Ruichen Liu (AnJie Broad)
In this article, authors Hao Zhan, Ying Song & Ruichen Liu (AnJie Broad) examine China’s newly released Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for the Pharmaceutical Sector, officially issued in January 2025 after a six-month public comment process. The Guidelines comprise 55 articles across seven chapters and apply broadly to traditional Chinese medicine, chemical drugs, and biological products across the entire pharmaceutical value chain. The article provides a detailed interpretation of key provisions and offers insights based on real-world enforcement and judicial experience in China.
The authors highlight a more flexible stance in the final Guidelines toward joint R&D agreements, especially where reasonable restrictions are involved. Notably, Article 11 removes provisions from the draft that would have classified certain R&D restrictions as per se illegal. Instead, enforcement authorities are expected to assess these agreements on a case-by-case basis, examining necessity, proportionality, and market impact. While this indicates a more tolerant approach, the authors advise pharmaceutical companies to thoroughly evaluate such agreements for competitive risks before execution.
The Guidelines also directly address pay-for-delay (reverse payment) agreements, with Article 13 identifying them as potential horizontal monopoly agreements when unjustified financial compensation is involved. The Supreme People’s Court has affirmed its jurisdiction to review such agreements under the Anti-Monopoly Law. Compared to earlier interpretations, the final Guidelines place stronger emphasis on the substance and market effects of these agreements, rather than just formal commitments like refraining from patent challenges. The authors recommend companies carefully assess the justifiability of compensation and the potential market implications before entering such settlements…
Featured News
Attorneys in NCAA Antitrust Case Awarded $475M in Fees
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Grants Elon Musk Additional Six Weeks to Respond in Twitter Stake Disclosure Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Dismisses Key Claims Against Google in Publishers’ Piracy Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Regulator Probes Asian Paints After Complaint by Aditya Birla’s Birla Opus
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
The 10-Year Ban on State AI Law Lives, At Least for Now, in Senate Version of Budget Bill
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros