
By: Cayetana Sanaolalla (Dublin City University Law & Tech)
In this blog post, author Cayetana Santaolalla (Dublin City University) writes about the evolving role of arbitration in the digital age and its intersection with blockchain technology.
Arbitration, as Rubellin-Devichi (1965) and Lew (2005) expressed, can be viewed as a conflict resolution mechanism that operates autonomously, independent of state or judicial authorities. These authors even considered it a non-national system for settling commercial disputes, existing on the margins of traditional legal frameworks. According to this perspective, arbitration functions as a self-contained process, detached from national legal orders—an idea closely linked to the emerging concept of arbitration in the metaverse, where blockchain, smart contracts, game theory, and cryptocurrencies or tokens play a key role.
The integration of arbitration into so-called cryptotribunals brings together law, technology, dispute resolution, justice administration, smart contracts, AI, and blockchain-based assets. Arbitration itself is a dispute resolution mechanism where parties, often through an arbitration clause, agree to entrust their case to a chosen arbitrator with recognized expertise.
Significant advancements in the field are already underway, including the development of crypto arbitration courts that leverage blockchain technology to resolve disputes. This innovative approach has the potential to radically transform the way justice is administered in the future. Several platforms, such as Aragon and Kleros, offer decentralised arbitration services, each operating with distinct methodologies.
Virtual arbitration courts function as decentralised, open justice platforms, typically running on public blockchains. While their service offerings vary, two fundamental innovations stand out. First, the random selection of arbitrators, ensuring impartiality, and second, on-chain enforcement, which enables the automatic transfer of cryptocurrencies, tokens, or other digital assets through smart contract execution.
These developments challenge the traditional legal and judicial framework, which struggles to adapt to digital realities that operate beyond national borders. Cryptotribunals, grounded in blockchain, smart contracts, and cryptocurrencies, signal a shift toward a new paradigm of dispute resolution—one that redefines legal authority in a decentralised digital environment…
Featured News
Attorneys in NCAA Antitrust Case Awarded $475M in Fees
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Grants Elon Musk Additional Six Weeks to Respond in Twitter Stake Disclosure Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Dismisses Key Claims Against Google in Publishers’ Piracy Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Regulator Probes Asian Paints After Complaint by Aditya Birla’s Birla Opus
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
The 10-Year Ban on State AI Law Lives, At Least for Now, in Senate Version of Budget Bill
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros