Vaughn Walker, Apr 30, 2009
I do not argue here that concern about judicial competence regarding complex economic evidence is without substance. Nor do I contend that mergers are best committed in the final analysis to generalist judicial officers who lack expertise in issues of industrial organization although, as will be noted, this provides some check against complete capture of merger policy for purely political purposes. Rather, accepting that in the United States we have committed important decisions about mergers to generalist judges, I argue that a judge´s task in a merger case does not entail recondite analysis. Rather, the judge´s task is less one of economic learning than it is of using the economic analysis to bring the evidence into sufficient focus to reach a decision.
Featured News
Bipartisan Senators Reintroduce Bill to Curb Use of Non-Competes
Jun 12, 2025 by
CPI
Senate Bill Would Shield AI Developers From Civil Liability In Certain Uses of Their Tools
Jun 12, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Considers Political Content Clause in Omnicom-Interpublic Merger Review
Jun 12, 2025 by
CPI
Female Athletes Challenge NCAA $2.7 Billion Settlement, Citing Title IX Concerns
Jun 12, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Rules Amazon Must Face Audiobook Antitrust Suit from Independent Authors
Jun 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros