Recent Regulatory Developments in Training Artificial Intelligence Models Under the GDPR

By: Marcus Evans & Rosie Nance (Norton Rose Fulbright)
In 2024, many organizations are increasingly exploring how to leverage their data to launch or enhance AI programs. A common approach is to use this data to train AI models or refine third-party models. Often, this involves processing personal data, requiring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU or UK.
X, formerly known as Twitter, recently attempted to train its AI chatbot, Grok, using data from user posts. However, following discussions with Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), the company agreed to suspend this data processing. This article examines the key events and offers considerations for data controllers when using personal data to train AI models.
On May 7, 2024, X introduced a new setting under ‘Settings and Privacy’ regarding Grok’s training. This setting, enabled by default, allowed users to opt out. Users were asked if they would “Allow your posts as well as your interactions, inputs, and results with Grok to be used for training and fine-tuning.”
Details on how to opt out are available on X’s website, which also notes that setting an account to private will prevent the use of posts for training Grok (only public posts are used).
In its privacy notice, X states: “We may use the information we collect and publicly available information to help train our machine learning or artificial intelligence models for the purposes outlined in this policy.” The company appears to rely on legitimate interests (Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR) to process data for model training and provides further details on its legitimate interests assessment on its website.
The Irish DPC applied to the Irish High Court to compel X to suspend data processing for this purpose. The case was heard on August 8, 2024. X’s Global Government Affairs department has noted that the DPC’s order would affect all AI models at X, not just Grok…
Featured News
Attorneys in NCAA Antitrust Case Awarded $475M in Fees
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Grants Elon Musk Additional Six Weeks to Respond in Twitter Stake Disclosure Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Dismisses Key Claims Against Google in Publishers’ Piracy Suit
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Regulator Probes Asian Paints After Complaint by Aditya Birla’s Birla Opus
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
The 10-Year Ban on State AI Law Lives, At Least for Now, in Senate Version of Budget Bill
Jun 8, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros